Undercover Newark officer’s contact with alleged prostitute forces review

Published: Friday, October 07, 2011, 7:30 AM    
Updated: Friday, October 07, 2011, 10:17 AM
From: NJ.com

samuel-demaio.JPG
Patti Sapone/The Star-LedgerNewark Police Director Samuel DeMaio is shown in this file photo.
 
After an undercover prostitution bust went wrong last month, DeMaio said the department will review how such operations are handled in the future.

NEWARK — When the Newark undercover vice officer entered the massage parlor on Bloomfield Avenue, he was supposed to be setting up a sting to bust a suspected prostitution ring.

The woman inside asked him if he wanted a massage. When the officer said yes, she asked him to take off his clothes. He complied, stripping down to his underwear, according to a police report.

But when she asked him if he wanted a “full massage,” what happened next set off series of events that has forced a change in the way the department handles undercover operations.

According to the police report, obtained Thursday by The Star-Ledger, the undercover officer — who was wired for sound — pleasured himself as he fondled the 22-year-old woman who was later arrested on prostitution charges.

In the wake of the Sept. 28 incident, Police Director Samuel DeMaio said he will now review and approve all future sting operations before they are launched and has ordered additional training for vice cops.

“There is no department protocol in place for what to do in an undercover vice operation. And that’s what we’re going to change,” DeMaio said in an interview Thursday. “Looking at it, certainly, there’s no bad intentions here on (the officer’s) part. I just don’t think he was prepped properly.”

DeMaio would not say what the six veteran detectives involved in the Sept. 28 operation — all veteran officers but new to the vice squad — should have done differently. However, he said, even though Newark trains its officers for narcotics stings, there is no protocol in place for undercover vice operations, including prostitution stings.

DeMaio said the six officers — the undercover officer, three arresting detectives and two supervisors — have been placed on administrative duty. In addition, the Essex County Prosecutor’s Professional Standards Bureau is expected to review the incident, authorities said.

Union leaders defended the detectives, saying they were new transfers to the vice squad who hadn’t received proper training.

“I would gladly work in a radio car with any one of them. They have dedicated their lives to this city,” said James Stewart Jr., vice president of Newark’s Fraternal Order of Police. “Unfortunately, as is often the case with departmental transfers, these officers were thrust into a situation without any outside training to prepare them on the textbook method of preparing a case for a successful conclusion through the judicial process.”

According to the police report, the woman offered the undercover officer various sexual favors, but then he declined her advances, repeatedly saying he was “new to this.” Eventually, he told her he would like to pleasure himself while touching her breast, the report said.

The woman asked for money “up front” for the massage, and the officer paid her $40, according to the report. Once he began pleasuring himself, the officer asked “how much more for the breast touch.” She replied “whatever,” and the officer gave her another $40, the report said.

Vice detectives swooped in moments later and arrested two women, charging them with promoting prostitution and several narcotics offenses, the report said.

DeMaio said the officer likely believed he was doing what he could to preserve the sting operation while trying to “avoid her having physical contact …”

Stewart said the incident is not indicative of a larger departmental problem, but shows the need for more realistic training of officers before they are placed in compromising scenarios.

“I have no doubt that once this investigation is concluded it will show proper training by the department could have avoided this situation,” he said.

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/10/newark_police_to_review_underc.html

 

Undercover Newark Cop Touched Himself And Fondled Masseuse During Sting Operation

Newark Police

First Posted: 10/7/11 05:37 PM ET Updated: 10/7/11 05:37 PM ET

Police in Newark, N.J., will implement a new protocol for sting operations after an undercover vice cop pleasured himself and fondled a masseuse during a prostitution bust at a massage parlor.

After being offered a “full massage” by a 22-year-old woman in a Bloomfield Avenue parlor on Sept. 28, the detective — who was wearing a wire — stripped down to his underwear, paid the woman $80 and touched himself while putting his hand on the masseuse’s breast, according to police documents obtained by The Star-Ledger.

Law enforcement officials reportedly burst into the massage parlor and arrested two women for promoting prostitution and narcotics charges.

The incident might raise eyebrows, but Newark Police Director Samuel DeMaio told the paper that the officer wasn’t acting with “bad intentions.”

“There is no department protocol in place for what to do in an undercover vice operation. And that’s what we’re going to change,” said DeMaio. “Looking at it, certainly, there’s no bad intentions here on (the officer’s) part. I just don’t think he was prepped properly.”

DeMaio placed the six detectives involved in the sting on administrative duty, according to Newsday.

News of the botched raid comes as the Newark Police Department faces heightened scrutiny.

Earlier this year, the Justice Department launched a federal investigation into the police force over years of allegations of misconduct. The investigation comes after the city laid off 162 officers citing budget constraints.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/07/undercover-newark-cop-sting_n_1000710.html?ref=tw

 

Hung star traded sex for sandwiches

  • From:AP – The Telegraph
  • October 03, 2011
Thomas Jane

Actor Thomas Jane from TV program ”Hung”. Source: Supplied

ACTOR Thomas Jane has shocked fans by opening up about the lengths he’d go to eat when he was a homeless teenager in Los Angeles – he’d perform sexual favours for sandwich money.

The Punisher star, who currently plays a well-endowed male prostitute in US TV drama Hung, admits he can identify with his desperate character in the series – because he once offered up sex perks to eat.

“When I was a kid out here in LA, I was homeless, I didn’t have any money and I was living in my car,” he tells the Los Angeles Times.

“I was 18. I wasn’t averse to going down to Santa Monica Boulevard and letting a guy buy me a sandwich. Know what I mean?

“You’re a lot more open to experimentation as a young man. And, for me, being a young artist and broke in Los Angeles, I was exploring my sexual identity.

“Probably, because of my middle-class, white, blue-collar upbringing, I would have never had the opportunity to confront some of my own fears and prejudices had I not been hungry enough to be forced to challenge myself in that way… It blew the doors off of my conventional upbringing and thinking.”

Jane says his gigolo days made him question his sexuality.

“Then you actually have a choice, and I chose to be a heterosexual guy because that’s what my DNA dictates and my nurture dictates that I am… It’s not a choice until you’re open enough to experience both male and female sexuality. Until you’ve tasted the food, you don’t know whether you’ll like it or not, as my mom always said.”

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/hung-star-traded-sex-for-sandwiches/story-fn6bm8z4-1226157409700

 

Women’s Funding Network Sex Trafficking Study Is Junk Science

Schapiro Group data wasn’t questioned by mainstream media.

By Nick Pinto
published: March 23, 2011
Courtesy of David Finkelhor

David Finkelhor, the director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire, says reporters need to resist the urge to cite bogus studies 
Steve Doig, the Knight Chair in Journalism at Arizona State University, says the Schapiro study is based on a logical fallacy

 

EDITOR’S NOTE: Village Voice Media, which owns this newspaper, owns the classified site Backpage. In addition to finding used cars, jobs, and couches, readers can also find adult ads on Backpage; for this reason, the Women’s Funding Network and its allies have often called attention to the site, sometimes going so far as to call for its closure.

Certainly we have a stake in this discussion. And we do not object to those who suggest an apparent conflict of interest. We sat quietly and did not respond as the WFN held symposiums across America — from Seattle to Miami — denouncing Backpage. Indeed, we were never asked for a response.

But then we looked at the “science” and the media’s willingness to regurgitate, without question, these incredible statistics. In the interest of a more informed discussion, we decided to write.

For background articles go to:
www.villagevoice.com/sex-traffickingWall of Shame: CNN, USA Today, and other media organizations got fooled

Super Bowling for Dollars: The great American game is another chance to foist false research on a gullible media

Beth Schapiro responds: “We stand fully behind our work”

ATTORNEYS REPRESENTING CRAIGSLIST told Congress on Sept. 15 that the ubiquitous web classifieds site was closing its adult section. Under intense scrutiny from the government and crusading advocacy groups, as well as state attorneys general, owner Craig Newmark famously applied the label “Censored” in his classifieds where adult advertising once appeared.

 During the same September hearing of a subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee, members of Congress listened to vivid and chilling accounts regarding underage prostitution. They heard testimony from half a dozen nonprofit executives and law enforcement officials. But the most alarming words of the day came from Deborah Richardson, the chief program officer of the Women’s Funding Network (WFN), who told legislators that juvenile prostitution is exploding at an astronomical rate.

“An independent tracking study released today by the Women’s Funding Network shows that over the past six months, the number of underage girls trafficked online has risen exponentially in three diverse states,” Richardson claimed. “Michigan: a 39.2 percent increase; New York: a 20.7 percent increase; and Minnesota: a staggering 64.7 percent increase.”

In the wake of this bombshell revelation, her disturbing figures found their way into some of the biggest newspapers in the country. USA Today, the Houston Chronicle, The Miami Herald, the Minneapolis Star Tribune, and the Detroit Free Press all repeated the dire statistics as gospel. The successful assault on Craigslist was followed by a cross-country tour by Richardson and the WFN.

None of the media that published Richardson’s astonishing numbers bothered to examine the study at the heart of her claim. If they had, they would have found what we did after asking independent experts to examine the research: It’s junk science.

After all, the numbers are guesses. The data are based merely on looking at photos on the Internet. There is no science.

Eric Grodsky, a sociologist at the University of Minnesota who teaches about proper research construction, says that the study is fundamentally flawed. “The method’s not clean,” he says. “You couldn’t get this kind of thing into a peer-reviewed journal. There are just too many unanswered questions about [the WFN's] methodology.”

Ric Curtis, the chairman of the anthropology department at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City, led a Justice Department–funded study on juvenile prostitution in New York City in 2008. He’s highly skeptical of the WFN study’s claims. “I wouldn’t trust those numbers,” he says. “This new study seems pretty bogus.”

In fact, the group behind the study admits as much. It’s now clear it used fake data to deceive the media and lie to Congress. And it was all done to score free publicity and a wealth of public funding.

“We pitch it the way we think you’re going to read it and pick up on it,” says Kaffie McCullough, the director of Atlanta-based antiprostitution group A Future Not a Past. “If we give it to you with all the words and the stuff that is actually accurate — I mean, I’ve tried to do that with our PR firm, and they say, ‘They won’t read that much.’”


A Future Not a Past is a product of the Atlanta Women’s Foundation, the Juvenile Justice Fund, and Harold and Kayrita Anderson’s foundation. To measure the amount of juvenile prostitution in the state, the consortium hired the Schapiro Group, an Atlanta business-consulting operation.

The Schapiro Group members weren’t academic researchers, and had no prior experience studying prostitution. In fact, the group was best known for research paid for by the American Chamber of Commerce Executives. The study found — surprise — that membership in the Chamber of Commerce improves businesses’ image.

The consultants came up with a novel, if not very scientific, method for tabulating juvenile prostitutes: They counted pictures of young-looking women on online classified sites.

“That’s one of the first problems right there,” Grodsky says. “These advertisers are in the business of making sales, and there’s a market for young-looking women. Why would you trust that the photographs are accurate?”

In other words, the ads, like the covers of women’s magazines, are relentlessly promoting fantasy. Anyone who has tried online dating understands the inherent trouble in trusting photographs.

Even if the person placing the advertisement is the one in the picture, there’s no telling how old the photo is, says David Finkelhor, the director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire. “How do you know when the pictures were taken?” he asks. “It’s not illegal for an 18-year-old who’s selling sex to put up a picture of herself from when she was 16.”

And if, for the sake of argument, the photos were an accurate portrayal, how do you train those viewing the photographs to guess the correct age? In fact, you don’t.

Before conducting its full study, the Schapiro Group tested the accuracy of its method in a sample of 100 observers. At one point, observers are described as a “random sample.” Elsewhere, they are described as “balanced by race and gender.” These 100 adults were shown pictures of teenagers and young adults whose ages were known, and were asked to guess whether they were younger than 18.

“The study showed that any given ‘young’-looking girl who is selling sex has a 38 percent likelihood of being under age 18,” reads a crucial passage in the study’s explanation of methodology. “Put another way, for every 100 ‘young’-looking girls selling sex, 38 are under 18 years of age. We would compute this by assigning a value of .38 to each of the 100 ‘young’ girls we encounter, then summing the values together to achieve a reliable count.”

This is dense gibberish posing as statistical analysis.

When the team went on to conduct its full statewide study, it simply treated this 38 percent success rate as a constant. Six new observers were then turned loose to count “young-looking” sex ads on online classifieds sites like Craigslist and Backpage. That total count was then multiplied by .38 to come up with a guesstimate of how many children were being trafficked.

“This is a logical fallacy,” says Steve Doig, the Knight Chair in Journalism at Arizona State University, who reviewed the study at our request. “Consider this analogy: Imagine that 100 people were shown pictures of various automobiles and asked to identify the make, and that 38 percent of the time people misidentified Fords as Chevrolets. Using the Schapiro logic, this would mean that 38 percent of Fords on the street actually are Chevys.”

But the Georgia sponsors were happy with the results — after all, the scary-sounding study agreed with what they were saying all along. So the Women’s Funding Network paid Schapiro to expand the study to Michigan, Minnesota, New York, and Texas. (Georgia’s Kayrita Anderson sits on the board of the Women’s Funding Network.) The WFN says it would like to run the study in all 50 states.

The count of online classifieds featuring “young women” is repeated every three months to track how the numbers change over time. That’s the source of Richardson’s claim of a 64 percent increase in child prostitution in Minnesota in a matter of months.

Finkelhor says that’s not how a scientific study is supposed to work. “They don’t tell you what the confidence intervals are, so these changes could just be noise,” he says. “When the Minnesota count goes from 102 to 112, that’s probably just random fluctuations.” There’s a more fundamental issue, of course: “The trend analysis is simply a function of the number of images on these site. … It’s not necessarily an indication that there’s an increase in the number of juveniles involved.”

Despite these flaws, the Women’s Funding Network, which has held rallies across the nation, has been flogging the results relentlessly through national press releases and local member organizations. In press releases, the group goes so far as to compare its conjured-up data to actual hard numbers for other social ills.

“Monthly domestic sex trafficking in Minnesota is more pervasive than the state’s annually reported incidents of teen girls who died by suicide, homicide, and car accidents (29 instances combined); infants who died from SIDS (6 instances); or women of all ages murdered in one year (37 instances),” the study reads. Of course, those other figures are rigorously compiled medical and law enforcement records of documented incidents, so it’s not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison.

The police who tally many of those actual statistics — as well as records of face-to-face encounters with juvenile prostitutes — don’t seem to be very impressed by the statistics put forward by the Women’s Funding Network. “The methodology that they used doesn’t really show the numbers that back it up,” says Sgt. John Bandemer, who heads the Gerald D. Vick Human Trafficking Task Force in St. Paul, Minn. “We take it with a grain of salt.”


The experts we consulted all agreed the Schapiro Group’s published methodology raises more questions than it answers. So we went to the Schapiro Group to ask those questions.

Beth Schapiro founded the Schapiro Group in 1984, starting out mostly with political consulting. The bulk of her group’s work, she says, consists of public opinion research. In 2007, the group installed its own phone-banking center. The group’s website advertises services including customer satisfaction surveys and “voter persuasion calls.”

Counting hard-to-find exploitation victims wasn’t exactly in the company’s repertoire when it was asked by A Future Not a Past to devise a study on juvenile prostitution in 2007, but Schapiro jumped at the opportunity.

The Georgia studies included efforts to count juvenile prostitutes on the street, at hotels, and in escort services, but they also marked the debut of the problematic online classifieds study that would later be reproduced in other states.

In a phone call this month, Schapiro insisted that her study was the first effort to scientifically determine the number of juvenile prostitutes — a claim that would likely surprise the authors of dozens of previous studies, several of which are footnoted in her report.

When we asked Schapiro and Rusty Parker, the leader of the classifieds study, to fill in some of the missing pieces in their methodology, they had a hard time coming up with straight answers. In fact, Parker couldn’t remember key information about how he constructed the study. When asked where he got the sample pictures used to calibrate the all-important 38 percent error rate, he wasn’t sure. “It was a while back,” he says. “I forget exactly where we got them from.”

Parker was equally fuzzy on how the researchers knew the ages of the people pictured in the control group. “Um … I’m afraid I do not remember,” he says.

You might say that this is important information. The Schapiro Group has been telling the world that it cracked the alchemical code that transforms dumb guesses into hard statistics, and that the magic number is .38. But the leader of the study can’t remember the procedure he followed to get that number.

Neither Schapiro nor Parker had any answers when asked whether there was any empirical reason to believe their two critical assumptions: that online photos always represent what the prostitutes actually look like, and that the six handpicked observers conducting the state studies have exactly the same error rate as the initial test batch of 100 random citizens.

Instead, Schapiro beat a hasty retreat, saying the study results shouldn’t be read as actual incidents of prostitution. “We’re the first to tell you, this is not a precise count of the number of girls being prostituted,” she says. “We make no bones about that.”

Of course, a precise count of the number of girls being prostituted is exactly what the statistics are being presented as in the media, in press releases, and in Schapiro’s own study. When this is pointed out, she reverses herself: “Well, yes, these are specific numbers. … And yes, they are hard numbers, and they are numbers that we stand completely behind.”

This is the kind of cognitive whiplash you have to endure if you try to follow Schapiro’s reasoning. She insists that the numbers have the weight of fact, and can properly be cited as actual incidents of juvenile prostitution. But when pressed to justify her study’s broad and unsupported assumptions, she says it is a work in progress and the numbers are only approximations.

Schapiro’s grasp on empirical rigor is such that when asked point-blank to choose between her two contradictory interpretations — estimates or facts — she opts for both. “I would square the circle by saying that you can look at them both ways,” she says.

Any reporters who had read the methodology of the Schapiro report would have been left with doubts, and any reporters who followed up would probably have been treated to the same baffling circuit of nonanswers. The fact that the study’s findings continue to be rebroadcast by national news outlets suggests that not one of these reporters has bothered to read the study about which they are writing.

“You see this kind of thing a lot, unfortunately,” says Rick Edmonds, a media business analyst for the Poynter Institute who writes frequently about statistics. “The kind of skepticism that reporters apply to a statement by a politician just doesn’t get applied to studies.”

Finkelhor says he understands the pressure on reporters to cite figures when they’re writing about juvenile prostitution, but it’s something they need to resist, because despite what groups like the Women’s Funding Network would have you believe, there simply are no good statistics. “You have to say, ‘We don’t know. Estimates have been made, but none of them have a real scientific basis to them,’” he says. “All you can say is, ‘This is the number the police know about, and we think there are more than that, but we don’t know how many more.’”


In her own online photos, the woman who commissioned the Schapiro Group study looks to be in her 50s, with blue eyes, graying hair, and a taste for dangly earrings. Kaffie McCullough first approached the group about conducting a study of juvenile prostitution in Georgia in 2007 when, as director of A Future Not a Past, she realized that having scientific-sounding numbers makes all the difference.

In early 2007, McCullough approached the Georgia Legislature to ask for money for a regional assessment center to track juvenile prostitution. “We had no research, no nothing. The legislators didn’t even know about it,” she recalls. “We got a little bit. We got about 20 percent of what we asked for.”

Later that year, the Schapiro Group made its first counts, and when McCullough returned to the Legislature the following session, she had the study’s statistics in hand. “It gave us traction — night and day,” she says. “That year, we got all the rest of that money, plus we got a study commission.”

McCullough touts the fundraising benefits of the study whenever she can. Since the Schapiro study was picked up for replication nationwide by the Women’s Funding Network, she has acted as a sort of technical consultant for state groups as they debate whether to invest in the project. Whenever she’s asked, she tells the local groups that the money they spend will come back to them with hefty dividends. “I would say, ‘The research costs money, but we’ve been able to broker — I don’t know what it is now, I think it’s over $1.3, $1.6 million in funding that we never would have gotten,’” she says.

McCullough initially maintained that she stands by the Schapiro Group study, in part because she says she was told that “it is the same scientific methodology that science has been using for a long time to measure endangered species.” But when pressed on whether she really believes that counting Internet photos is reliable, she grants that the sex-work industry isn’t exactly the gold standard of truth in advertising. “That’s absolutely correct,” she says. “That’s part of how that business operates: It’s a bait-and-switch.”

And given the tricky nature of the photographs, she admits that counting pictures isn’t a precise way to measure juvenile prostitutes. “I can’t guarantee that any picture that four of those six people said looked young — that may not be the girl that you’d get if you called up,” she concedes.

Asked whether she has any reason to believe that the six observers in the study have the identical 38 percent error rate as the 100 random citizens who were the initial test subjects, she allows that it might be worth revisiting that question.

The basic truth is that the study exists in service of the advocacy, and if news outlets present the Schapiro Group’s numbers as gospel, it certainly doesn’t hurt the advocates’ cause.

Admitting that there is no authoritative scientific count of juvenile prostitution, as Finkelhor recommends, isn’t an option for McCullough. She recalls an early presentation she made in Nebraska, when a politician gave her a piece of advice that stuck.

“He said, ‘If you all as a movement don’t start having numbers, you are going to lose the money,’” McCullough recalls. “‘How can you justify millions of dollars when there are only hundreds of victims that you’re actually serving?’”


Editor’s conclusion: On March 16, the drumbeat continued in the U.S. Senate with a briefing on domestic sex trafficking of minors that featured actress Mira Sorvino and the startling statistic that 100,000 children are trafficked for sex annually in America. Trafficking — in labor and sex — became a defining issue in the administration of President George W. Bush. But as an investigation by the Washington Post in 2007 revealed, victims in the sex trade were difficult to come by. Today, advocates have shifted media attention to allegations of trafficking in children. But facts to suggest a plague of underage perversion simply do not exist, despite claims to the contrary.

In a deficit-obsessed Congress, there is a long line of those seeking tax dollars to raise awareness of trafficking: government agencies, nonprofits, religious groups, the well-intentioned, as well as abolitionists opposed to pornography and adult services.

It is no surprise that some seek to use children as a wedge.

Responsible parties prosecute predators and rescue victims. Not everyone with a microphone is responsible. The challenge of keeping children out of the hands of exploiters is real, but solutions are not clear in an atmosphere of hyped hysteria.

http://www.sfweekly.com/2011-03-23/news/sex-trafficking-fake-study-womans-funding-network-deborah-richardson-nick-pinto/

 

Kutcher tweets in anger at article

  • From: NewsCore
  • news.com.au
  • June 30, 2011
 
Ashton Kutcher

Cause and effect: Ashton Kutcher has blasted a newspaper that criticised his campaign against child prostitution. Picture: AFP Source: AFP

ASHTON Kutcher has launched a Twitter offensive against a newspaper that question his advocacy work.

Kutcher used the microblogging service to slam The Village Voice, a New York City newspaper, after it published an article criticising his campaign against underage prostitution in the US.

A furious Kutcher – aka @aplusk – let rip in a series of tweets to his more than seven million followers responding to the report in the weekly which questioned statistics he used about the number of child sex slaves in the US.

He wrote, “Hey @villagevoice if you ever want 2 have a productive conversation about how 2 end human trafficking as oppose to belittling my efforts lmk [let me know].”

Referring to the classified advertising website backpage.com, which is owned by Village Voice Media, the same company which publishes The Village Voice, he added, “Hey @villagevoice you keep collecting the check from Selling Girls on Backpage and leave helping them to people who give a F***”

Kutcher – star of “That ’70s Show” and “Punk’d” – warned the magazine, “Hey @villagevoice I’m just getting started!!!!!!!! BTW I only PLAYED stupid on TV.”

The magazine article described Kutcher as a “technically literate, if ill-informed, advocate” who “made his bones playing the prankster, dummy, and stoner”.

Kutcher concluded, “Hey @villagevoice REAL MEN DON’T BUY GIRLS and REAL NEWS PUBLICATIONS DON’T SELL THEM.”

Kutcher has been at the forefront of a campaign to highlight the issue of underage prostitution, with the “Dude, Where’s My Car?” star heading up a series of adverts “Real Men Don’t Buy Girls”.

The lengthy article in The Village Voice claimed the figure of “100,000 to 300,000 children” sold for sex in the US – which Kutcher and wife Demi Moore relied upon during an interview with CNN’s Piers Morgan – was a wild overestimate.

The magazine said the figure actually relates to the number of young people “at risk” of falling into prostitution, and that its own research showed 8263 arrests across the US for child prostitution in the past 10 years.

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/story-fn7mjoe2-1226085179911#ixzz1TgzDKQa5

 

Shocking: Sex Workers Are Being Prosecuted for Carrying Condoms

AlterNet
By Laura Rena Murray
30th May 2011

A lot of sex workers are afraid to carry condoms because they could face arrest, but many do so anyway because they don’t want to put themselves at risk of contracting HIV.

At Lafayette Avenue and Barretto Street, a young man slowly navigated a maroon van past empty warehouses in search of street sex workers. The woman seated next to him remained silent, staring out the passenger side window. When he saw a familiar woman walking alone, he pulled over and decided to wait as she solicited a black Nissan. Less than two minutes after getting in the car, she exited and approached the van to get condoms and food. She nervously told the woman in the passenger seat that she turned the Nissan down after realizing it was an undercover cop.

When the van circled the block five minutes later, the same woman was caught between two grey and black vans. Her wrists were cuffed and a stained canvas bag lay at her feet, its contents — the newly acquired condoms and food — were spilled on the street.

Ricardo “Pichi” Canales, 33, and Lana Rosas, 25, drive around the Bronx and Harlem every Friday evening doing outreach for Citiwide, a harm-reduction organization in the South Bronx that provides free condoms and other miscellaneous health supplies to intravenous drug users and sex workers. New York City started distributing free male condoms in 1971 to prevent the spread of sexually transmitted infections. Today, these condoms are used as evidence in prostitution arrests. In January, a bill that would prohibit police from submitting condoms as evidence of prostitution or intent to solicit will be introduced in Albany. The “No Condoms As Evidence” bill, co-sponsored by N.Y. Senator Velmanette Montgomery, has been reintroduced every year since 1999 but has yet to make it to the floor for a vote. On March 24, the N.Y. Senate Codes Committee passed the bill and sent it to the Judiciary Committee for consideration.

—–

Far from Albany, the Citiwide van door slid open to reveal four large storage containers perched behind the driver and passenger seats. The middle seat had been removed to make room for the bins containing condoms, hygiene supplies, bleach kits and 15 food packages prepared by Bailey’s House, a homeless shelter in New York City.

After ordering off the dollar menu, Rosas, Canales and Kobrak planned the night’s outreach strategy as they quickly ate their sandwiches in the McDonald’s parking lot.

Canales warned that the streets would be quiet and explained that sex workers don’t go out as much at the beginning of the month. “A lot of girls are in the clubs,” he said. “Soldiers get their pension checks and come here to the clubs, rent a girl, go to the house and spend the whole night getting high.”

The first woman they spotted was Sue, a bleached blonde in her late 40s. She stood in the shadows of an abandoned Hunts Point warehouse with two older black men. One of the men approached Rosas to ask for food, condoms and a hygiene kit. Canales identified him as Sue’s pimp, Thaddeus. According to Rosas, Thaddeus runs a couple of shooting galleries, abandoned houses where people go to shoot up drugs. Shooting galleries also provide space where sex workers can sleep and dealers can sell drugs. “It’s crazy. You see people sleeping in the bathroom, in the living room, in the bedroom and in the hall,” Canales said.

A dark sedan pulled up to the opposite corner, one of Sue’s regulars. As she hurried to open the passenger-side door, Thaddeus called out to let her know he would wait for her to return.

According to Canales, most of the sex workers he sees have pimps. Sometimes, it is a very beneficial relationship and other times it can be exploitative. Age and addiction are two major factors that determine how much autonomy and equality sex workers have in their relationships with their pimps. Some women derive most of their emotional support from their pimps, while others just look for someone who won’t beat them and will bail them out of jail if they’re arrested.

One of Rosas’ clients put it succinctly when she defined her standards for a good pimp. “My man is a real man,” she said. “He don’t put me out on the street when it’s cold or rainy. But he will rob a motherfucker so we can eat.”

The cops are a big obstacle to Citiwide’s outreach work. Rosas described how cops frequently followed women after they stopped at the van and arrested them. Many times, cops would use the very condoms sex workers obtained from Canales and Rosas as evidence of their intent to solicit.

As the night progressed, four separate arrests occurred within sight of the van. Two took place immediately after sex workers accessed services from Citiwide.

—–

“The issue is the criminalization of carrying condoms,” said Johanna Westmacott of the Safe Horizon’s Streetwork Program. She works with trafficked minors who end up on the streets of New York. Westmacott is also a member of the PROS Network, a group of service providers and activists who are working to pass the No Condoms As Evidence bill.

A lot of sex workers said they were afraid to carry condoms because of police behavior but many face the chance of arrest because they don’t want to put themselves at risk of contracting HIV. They frequently described having their bags dumped onto the sidewalk and condoms confiscated by police.

Court records often list condoms as evidence of prostitution or loitering for the purposes of prostitution. Some supporting deposition forms list as few as one or two “NYC” condoms, distributed for free by the health department. Attorney Melissa Sontag Broudo of the Urban Justice Center warned against the public health consequences of criminalizing condoms. “It’s really a public health concern for sex workers,” she said. “And for people in general, for the right to be able to protect your bodily integrity and be able to protect yourself.”

—–

Back on the streets of Hunts Point, Canales directed the van onto the Grand Concourse and headed toward 192 Street and Jerome Avenue, a well-known transgender stroll. He was forced to halt the van when a fight erupted in the middle of Mt Eden Avenue near Townsend Avenue. Thirty teenagers blocked traffic while five women attacked one another, jeered on by their peers. According to Rosas, violence is a given.

“You see some pretty heinous shit at night,” she said. “I’ve definitely, during outreach, seen one of the girls get stabbed.”

Canales recalled feeling helpless when he saw violent pimps on the street and described one instance when he saw a pimp punch a woman in the face. Rosas carries a knife when she performs outreach, just in case.

—–

Around 2am, Canales spotted another familiar face at 128 Street and Third Avenue in Harlem and pulled the van over. The young Latina woman looked stricken as she shook her head no and waved the van off. As Canales drove away, Rosas pointed out the woman’s pimp, who was standing nearby in the shadows, as well as two cop cars, which were parked halfway down the block.

Canales circled the block. When he passed the intersection again, the cop cars had moved to the corner. The flashing red and blue lights lit up the street as the policemen handcuffed the couple.

http://www.alternet.org/story/151132/shocking:_sex_workers_are_being_prosecuted_for_carrying_condoms?page=entire

 

Sex Trafficking of Americans: The Girls Next Door

Even as celebrity activists such as Emma Thompson, Demi Moore, and Mira Sorvino raise awareness about commercial sex trafficking, survivor Rachel Lloyd publishes her memoir Girls Like Us, and the Senate introduces a new bipartisan bill for victim support, the problem proliferates across continents, in casinos, on streets, and directly into your mobile device. And, as Amy Fine Collins shows, human trafficking is much closer to home than you think; victims, younger than ever, are just as likely to be the homegrown American girl next door as illegally imported foreigners. Having gained access to victims, law-enforcement officials, and a convicted trafficker, Collins follows a major case that put to the test the federal government’s Trafficking Victims Protection Act.

Vanity Fair
By
Amy Fine Collins
Photographs by Larry Fink
WEB EXCLUSIVE May 24, 2011

The names of all victims and their relatives have been changed. Quotes from Dennis Paris, Gwen, and Alicia are taken from court testimony.

“He called me a stupid bitch … a worthless piece of shit.… I had to tell people I fell off stage because I had so many bruises on my ribs face and legs.… I have a permanent twitch in my eye from him hitting me in my face so much. I have none of my irreplaceable things from my youth.”
—From the victim-impact statement of Felicia, minor prostitute-stripper enslaved by trafficker Corey Davis.

“Prostitution is renting an organ for ten minutes.”
—A john, interviewed by research psychologist Melissa Farley.

“Would you please write down the type of person you think I am, given all that you’ve heard and read?… I’ve been called the worst of the worst by the government and it’s going to be hard for you to top that.”
—Letter postmarked June 27, 2008, to Amy Fine Collins, from Dennis Paris, a.k.a. “Rahmyti,” then inmate at the Wyatt Detention Facility, in Central Falls, Rhode Island, now at a high-security federal penitentiary in Arizona.

The Little Barbies

In the Sex Crimes Bureau of the Brooklyn District Attorney’s Office, in the pediatric division of Fort Bragg’s Womack Army Medical Center, in the back alleys of Waterbury, Connecticut, and in the hallways of Hartford’s Community Court, Assistant D.A. Rhonnie Jaus, forensic pediatrician Dr. Sharon Cooper, ex-streetwalker Louise, and Judge Curtissa Cofield have all simultaneously and independently noted the same disturbing phenomenon. There are more young American girls entering the commercial sex industry—an estimated 300,000 at this moment—and their ages have been dropping drastically. “The average starting age for prostitution is now 13,” says Rachel Lloyd, executive director of Girls Educational and Mentoring Services (gems), a Harlem-based organization that rescues young women from “the life.” Says Judge Cofield, who formerly presided over Hartford’s Prostitution Protocol, a court-ordered rehabilitation program, “I call them the Little Barbies.”

The explanations offered for these downwardly expanding demographics are various, and not at all mutually exclusive. Dr. Sharon Cooper believes that the anti-intellectual, consumerist, hyper-violent, and super-eroticized content of movies (Hustle & Flow), reality TV (Cathouse), video games (Grand Theft Auto: Vice City), gangsta rap (Nelly’s “Tip Drill”), and cyber sites (Second Life: Jail Bait) has normalized sexual harm. “History is repeating itself, and we’re back to treating women and children as chattel,” she says. “It’s a sexually toxic era of ‘pimpfantwear’ for your newborn son and thongs for your five-year-old daughter.” Additionally, Cooper cites the breakdown of the family unit (statistically, absent or abusive parents compounds risk) and the emergence of vast cyber-communities of like-minded deviant individuals, who no longer have disincentives to act on their most destructive predatory fantasies. Krishna Patel, assistant U.S. attorney in Bridgeport, Connecticut, invokes the easy money. Criminals have learned, often in prison—where “macking” memoirs such as Iceberg Slim’s Pimp are best-sellers—that it’s become more lucrative and much safer to sell malleable teens than drugs or guns. A pound of heroin or an AK-47 can be retailed once, but a young girl can be sold 10 to 15 times a day—and a “righteous” pimp confiscates 100 percent of her earnings.

“There are basically two business models: manipulating girls through violence—that’s called ‘gorilla’ pimping—and controlling them with drugs,” says Patel, who prosecuted the case of New York–based trafficker Corey Davis, a.k.a. “Magnificent.” A high-living, highly educated pimp who kept the slave master’s manifesto The Willie Lynch Letter and the Making of a Slave in his Mercedes, Davis, Patel says, made sex slaves out of, among others, a 12-year-old runaway and a university coed on a track scholarship. To force them to do his bidding, Davis allegedly sliced a girl in his “stable” with a box cutter and stomped others into submission with a special pair of Timberland boots—a technique known as “Timming.” Another female, a 15-year-old patient of Dr. Sharon Cooper’s, was zipped into a duffel bag and deposited by her pimp on a six-lane highway. The pimp of Caroline (a former Connecticut 4-H Club member) plucked out her fingernails one by one until she passed out from the pain. Natalie, an ex–Catholic schoolgirl rescued by gems, was from the age of 13 tortured or beaten with water, belts, chains, even a bag of frozen oranges. “Pimping,” Natalie says, “is not cool. A pimp is a wife beater, rapist, murderer, child-molester, drug dealer, and slave driver rolled into one.”

Says Krishna Patel, “I’d always dismissed the idea of human trafficking in the United States. I’m Indian, and when I went to Mumbai and saw children sold openly, I wondered, Why isn’t anything being done about it? But now I know—it’s no different here. I never would have believed it, but I’ve seen it. Human trafficking—the commercial sexual exploitation of American children and women, via the Internet, strip clubs, escort services, or street prostitution—is on its way to becoming one of the worst crimes in the U.S.”

Detective Scates

With her high cheekbones, long chestnut hair, and trim physique, former detective Deborah Scates, of the Hartford Police Department, looks less like a medal-decorated cop than like a champion equestrienne, a previous avocation that carried her all the way from her native Colorado to Vienna, where she learned to handle Lipizzaners. “I was lucky enough to study in Austria just after they opened up the riding school to allow females,” Scates says. “They hadn’t known that women could control stallions.”

After moving east and marrying, Scates worked as a construction-site manager. When her two children entered middle school, in the 1990s, she enrolled in the Hartford Police Academy, with the objective of becoming a mounted officer. Not long after she joined the force, Hartford disbanded its mounted-police unit. Assigned to vice, she worked undercover for 10 years, busting dope dealers, gang members, prostitutes, and pimps. Several years ago she sustained injuries in a head-on crash during a narcotics-related car chase. “The hardest part was missing work,” she says. One of her career coups was the bringing down of the Alpha Club, a brothel that had operated undisturbed in Hartford for 25 years. “A judge asked me, ‘Why go after prostitution?’ And I answered, ‘For one thing it’s against the law.’ ” The case was successfully prosecuted in March 2004, and a framed check for $346,104, the amount Scates secured for her department in the asset forfeiture, was hung in Hartford’s police headquarters.

During a routine reverse sting in Hartford on August 18, 2004, a man approached Scates (who was acting as a decoy), asking for a blow job. “He said he knew how much I was worth, and offered me $20.” Once Scates, who also modeled in her youth, informed the john that she was a cop, he tried to bribe her with tickets to a University of Connecticut basketball game and team paraphernalia stashed in the back of his four-by-four. The man in search of fellatio, it turned out, was UConn’s assistant basketball coach, Clyde Vaughan, who, it emerged, had a history of similar arrests out of state. Scates, who “used to do 50 johns a night,” never wore provocative apparel to conduct these operations; “my clothes would then have been submitted as evidence, and the issue of entrapment would have been raised.”

That same summer, Scates was out on Hartford’s Wethersfield Avenue, in the south end of the city, this time working a sting in which a male colleague impersonated a john. A girl got into the male cop’s unmarked vehicle, propositioned him, and was promptly dispatched to Scates for processing. The prostitute caught in the vice unit’s net was a fragile, ghostly, almost child-like blonde. Barely five feet tall and scarcely 90 pounds, she was strung out, desperate, and terrified. “This girl did not fit in with the Hartford streets,” Scates says.

Scates tried to get information from the girl, but “she was too high,” she says. The girl took the lady cop’s name and phone number, put them in her pocket, and was sent to Community Court, which in Hartford processes up to Class A misdemeanors. Gwen, as the girl was called, was put on ice at the York Correctional Institution, in Niantic, for two weeks to dry out, ordered to attend a women’s holistic-health seminar and a 14-day counseling program, and eventually placed with her Aunt Lucy, her only relative in the area.

Late one afternoon, Detective Scates received a call from Community Court coordinator Chris Pleasanton, who said the girl named Gwen attending the counseling class was in hysterics, afraid for her life, convinced that someone was coming after her.

Scates met again with Gwen. “She was telling me how she had been shot with heroin and raped, how men would come in and have sex with her. And I thought, Yeah, sure—I thought she was trying to talk her way out of the program. Then she mentioned the name ‘Rahmyti’—a name I’d known since my first day on the force—and her story started making sense. And she told me about another girl, Alicia. So I started looking into the allegations”—a thorny undertaking that would consume her attention for nearly four years, and, Scates says, “change my life, and how I am a police officer.”

Officer Deborah Scates of the Hartford Police Mounted Unit, who cracked the breakthrough domestic trafficking case involving two New England blondes, in full-dress uniform on Zeus, in South Windsor, Connecticut.

Brian Forbes

‘Rahmyti” was the self-aggrandizing alias of Dennis Paris, a short, 300-pound, 32-year-old smooth talker who inhabited the dimmer fringes of the local club scene, and who had aspirations to become a rapper, like the musicians he claimed to represent. Gwen, the product of a broken home (her mom, caught up in an abusive relationship, did not allow her to know her father) in a lily-white Vermont village, had met Paris in an irregular fashion. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, she had been sold to him, for $1,200, in a package deal with her best friend, Alicia. The vendor was Brian Forbes, a six-foot-five-inch, 40-year-old bodybuilder, whom local law enforcement understood to be employed in the bail-bond business.

In the fall of 2003, after turning 18, Gwen headed down to Hartford to visit her Aunt Lucy, her mother’s sister. Her aunt, in turn, introduced her niece to Brian Forbes. “She told me he was a really nice guy and stuff,” Gwen said. Employing a technique not unlike the “love-bombing” used by cults, Brian Forbes began to wine and dine her. “He was really nice,” Gwen recalled. “You know, he could give me, you know, anything I wanted.” Pimps refer to this trust-building courtship phase as “seasoning,” and they can be extremely patient. Forensic pediatrician Dr. Sharon Cooper, a specialist in treating juvenile victims of sex trafficking, terms the process “grooming.” Girls acquainted with “the life” call it “spitting game.” Forbes, Scates notes, was a master at singling out, on the high-school campus or at the shopping center, the vulnerable girl with abysmal self-esteem. “And,” she says, “he sensed what lines would be most effective on which girl.”

When Forbes took Gwen to his two-bedroom apartment above a hair salon in East Hartford, he introduced her to “Toni,” a woman in her 20s living there. Toni (real name: Shanaya Hicks), he explained, was his girlfriend. Gwen was startled, as she had every reason to believe that Forbes had fallen head over heels for her.

Gwen’s Aunt Lucy, of course, had set her up. Intra-familial recruiting of sex slaves is a common practice. Eva, a Norwich, Connecticut, girl, was forced by her mother-in-law—via starvation, drugs, and threats to her baby boys—into prostituting herself at Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun, the Connecticut casinos. Caroline, the former 4-H member, was taken to a brothel by her best friend’s mom and a pastor, the Reverend Henry L. Price. Gwen was especially easy prey for her aunt and Forbes because, before she had even left Vermont, she was hooked on heroin—a virtual epidemic nowadays in the New England and New York suburbs because of its current purity, potency, and cheapness.

During the honeymoon period of perhaps a month, Forbes asked Gwen if she knew of any friends back home who might want to join them in Connecticut. Gwen thought that Alicia, a pal since they were 12, might be interested. Like Gwen, Alicia had come from a broken home, and had developed a heroin habit. She too was a pale blonde, but a little tougher and taller than her more delicate and docile friend. On a Friday night in the fall of 2003, Brian Forbes and Gwen pulled up in front of a New Hampshire movie theater, directly over the bridge from Gwen’s hometown, and picked up Alicia, who had just been thrown out of the house after a dustup with her mother. The three of them rode the four hours back to Connecticut, with Gwen at the wheel.

“At first,” Gwen recounted, “[things] were fine, and then, all of a sudden, it was not fine.” After the girls returned to Connecticut, Forbes took them to a Holiday Inn in affluent West Hartford, where there was a man waiting to have sex with them, Alicia later testified. “Brian brought us upstairs,” Alicia recalled. “We did what the guy asked. He asked for us to fool around together and then have intercourse with him.… I was nervous … disgusted … confused.” Forbes pocketed the cash paid up front by the john. “We never got any money from Brian or from any of the calls,” Gwen said. Alicia begged Forbes to take her home. He vowed they would return “that Monday,” she remembered. When he failed to keep his word, Alicia protested—and Forbes retaliated, she later recounted in court, by “forcing himself” on her. To “break down” the girls further, Forbes began to withhold heroin from them for a few days, “and still have us do the work sick, which caused even more problems because we can’t operate,” Alicia said. During the enforced withdrawal, Alicia explained, “you can’t move. You’re cramped. You shake. You don’t want to shower. You don’t want to be touched.” Gwen added, “You can’t hold your bowel movements or anything.” Caroline, the 4-H girl, whom Forbes had preyed upon several years earlier, when she was 17, notes, “Customers like it if you’re high, because they can take advantage of you.”

The first time Gwen and Alicia tried to leave Forbes’s apartment on their own, their keeper tracked them right down. (“Pimps always know everything,” says Cheryl, a gems girl.) Forbes herded them back to their bedroom, Gwen testified, and this time padlocked them in and, Alicia added, nailed the window shut. “Toni,” who was not so much Forbes’s girlfriend as his “bottom” (a pimp’s female second-in-command), stood guard, and, Alicia said, “we were [incarcerated in the room] unless we had to go to the bathroom or [a] customer, client would come in for intercourse.” In addition to forcing the women to be available for sex with paying men in the padlocked room “24-7”—a term that Dr. Sharon Cooper says originates directly from “the game”—Forbes would force himself on her whenever and however he wanted, Alicia testified. “If I tried to refuse,” she said, “he would grab my throat and hold me down until he was able to get inside me.” Says Caroline, “Most rape victims get it once—for us, it happens millions and millions of times.”

Eventually, court documents show, Forbes, to maximize his profits, began to share Gwen and Alicia—whom he had renamed “Amanda” and “Jessica”—with Dennis Paris, a friend who had just been released from prison on a third-degree larceny conviction. Slicker and more entrepreneurial than Forbes, he distributed business cards, took out ads in Hartford’s Yellow Pages and the “adult” classified section of The Hartford Advocate (a local giveaway paper), and accepted Visa, MasterCard, and Discover—all under his L.L.C., Paris Enterprises Group, and Connecticut Companions. He also had at his command a fleet of drivers (“catchers”) to convey girls to “out calls,” to whatever location the client desired. “My clientele was usually upper-class, middle-class white businessmen,” Paris boasted. Before Paris allowed Forbes to lend him the girls, however, he submitted Gwen and Alicia to an inspection, in late November 2003, at his deceased mother’s condominium on Trolley Crossing Lane, in Middletown, Connecticut. There, Paris photographed their nude bodies, inventoried their piercings and tattoos, measured them from head to toe, and carefully jotted down his observations on a yellow notepad, Alicia later testified.

The girls complained to Paris about Forbes’s abuse—choking, raping, and imprisonment of them, according to court documents. If they defected, Paris adjured, there would be money for them, no physical harm, and a plentiful supply of drugs. “He was really nice,” Gwen said, “and it was so bad [with Forbes] that anything else would be better.” Says one Fed, who assisted Detective Scates with the Alpha Club bust, and, in time, the Paris case as well, “Paris is the proverbial ‘sell snow to the Eskimos’ BS-er.”

Then, one day in December 2003, at a sleazy motor inn on the Berlin Turnpike—an 11.2-mile time-warp stretch of asphalt, lined on either side with at least 37 other no-tell motels—Paris remitted Forbes $1,200, and the girls, court documents show, were his. Buying girls like livestock is not unusual. Cheryl, a gems girl, at about 14 was sold by one pimp, “Love,” to another pimp, “Junior,” for $600. The New York City Police detective Wayne Taylor—convicted in July 2008 for the attempted kidnapping of a 13-year-old—purchased his thrall for $500 from a Brooklyn “pimp partner.” In fact, the price for an adolescent female slave is far lower than it was in the mid–19th century, when, adjusted to today’s dollar, the going rate was roughly $40,000, the price of a car.

Convicted sex trafficker Dennis Paris (a.k.a. “Rahmyti”) conferring with defense attorney Jeremiah Donovan at the Wyatt Detention Facility in Central Falls, Rhode Island.

Dennis Paris

Once they were his chattel, Paris installed the girls at the two-story Motel 6 near Jennings Road, where he himself temporarily resided. He renamed the two 18-year-old blondes “Sasha” (Alicia) and “Ava” (Gwen) and “taught them how a woman should dress,” Paris said. “Gucci, Moschino, Blahnik.” He marketed them in The Hartford Advocate either under these exotic pseudonyms or by means of such time-tested come-ons as “Naughty Housewives,” “Gorgeous Blondes, Pure Pleasure, No Boundaries,” and “Girls, Girls, Girls!”

For the first few weeks, true to his pledge, Paris gave Gwen and Alicia a portion of their earnings. He took them to the mall and out to eat, and “you felt like you were free,” Gwen said. He even let them go home for Christmas in 2003. But as soon as their holiday leave expired, they went back “to hell,” Scates says. Alicia later testified that he forced them to do 8 to 10 calls a day, seven days a week, and deducted from the money earned the cost of their rooms, their food, their clothes (“mostly underwear,” Scates says), and their drugs—with which he manipulated them, much as Forbes had. Additionally, he devised what Gwen called “stupid little fines”—for being late, for complaining, for not combing their hair—so that, in effect, far from drawing a living wage, they were, according to Paris’s peonage economy, constantly in debt bondage to him. And, Paris estimated, the girls were each generating “at least a thousand dollars a day.” (This is not an idle boast: Caroline calculates that she converted her body into well over $1 million in cash for just one of her pimps, a former driver for Paris.) Paris’s friends, however, were allowed to gang-rape Gwen for free, she told a jury.

Paris’s captives (as various girls’ statements corroborate) were not permitted to refuse a john any request, no matter how frightening, harmful, vile, or degrading—be it videotaping anal rape, beating them black-and-blue (the evidence of which would excite admiring comments from Paris), or smearing them with puke. “Johns are even more dangerous than pimps,” says Caroline, who had her own close encounter with a necrophiliac. (Homicide is the No. 1 cause of death among prostituted females, ahead of aids.) Paris, court documents show, laughed when some of the girls begged to be spared a client known for abuse, and he knocked a tooth out of Gwen’s mouth, she recounted in court, when she became defiant. Only one of Alicia’s customers didn’t demand sex—he hired her to cook dinner while he watched the evening news naked. At a stag party, Alicia watched Paris choke another girl and take her out of the room. “She didn’t come back,” Alicia recalled in court. Before an audience of his cronies, Paris took pornographic photographs—of Gwen on all fours, for instance, naked except for a dog collar and a leash. “We couldn’t use the pictures in court because they were too prejudicial,” says one agent of the law. When Alicia called Paris from a session, crying, he ordered her to continue anyway, and even though she was “ripping and bleeding,” he took her “immediately … to another call,” Alicia recounted. He told Alicia that if she disobeyed him, trial transcripts show, he would dragoon her little sister into becoming a replacement whore. And he complained to Alicia that she and Gwen “weren’t worth the money he paid.”

At one point another pimp showed up, pretending to be a client, and kidnapped the two girls. He hauled them up to Boston, where they were cooped up in a shack. Though there is a system for acquiring girls from one another, known as “serving,” pimps often break their own rules and steal “bitches” outright. Gwen and Alicia were especially coveted because of their skin color. In a rigid hierarchy that clinical psychologist Melissa Farley—founder of Prostitution Research & Education, a San Francisco–based think tank—calls “eroticized racism,” the “snow bunnies” (white girls) outclass the “ducks” (black girls). “Maybe one out of 50 callers would request a black or Latina,” says Caroline. “Most asked for ‘the girl next door’—a blonde, thin teenager with big breasts. That’s candy to ants.”

In the summer of 2004, Alicia swiped some of the compromising photographs that Paris stored in his black briefcase, a portable office where he also kept his credit-card processing machines and terminal, credit-card receipts, copies of his ads, bank statements, and the yellow notepads on which he logged the names, addresses, and sexual tastes of johns (e.g., “Greek,” “girlfriend experience”), as well as directions to their houses. Enraged about the theft and convinced that Alicia was plotting with a hometown boyfriend to use the pictures to build a case against him, Paris took her to his room in the Motel 6, locked the door, beat her, stripped her, handcuffed her to his bed face down, raped her, rolled her in a blanket, and prepared to overdose her with heroin, according to court documents. He seized her Social Security card and other identity papers, and, Alicia testified, instructed an associate, Barry Perez, to obtain some shovels in order to dispose of her body, apparently along the Connecticut River near a marshland known as “the Meadows.”

“I’m already crying. I’m already begging, Why are you doing this? … I’m being completely ignored,” Alicia recounted. “So at this point I just give up… . And I just made myself deal with the fact that I was going to die.”

But, in the end, Perez later testified, he did not carry out Paris’s order. After a pit stop for McDonald’s takeout, Paris returned to the motel room and hit Alicia one last time. Alicia managed in the aftermath to phone her mother and, though hyperventilating, incoherent, disoriented, and sobbing wildly, instructed her to file a missing person’s report in Hartford if there was no further word from her in a couple of weeks, Alicia later testified.

Rather than kill her, prosecutors later charged, Paris had a bondsman cohort, Ronald Martinez, and his sidekick Kazimierz Sulewski arrest Alicia for “failure to appear”—while the pimp watched and chortled from a yellow convertible. Alicia had old warrants out on her for forgery and violation of probation, circumstances Paris had all along exploited as “a ploy to keep her in line,” Scates says. In fact, Martinez, through his state-licensed business, Liberty Bail Bonds of Connecticut, L.L.C., had been prostituting girls, too. He would frequent police stations, offering to pay the bail of girls arrested for shoplifting or breach of peace, and of their drug-dealing boyfriends, Scates explains—and then demand they work off their debt by selling their bodies, via his shadow organizations, Fantasy Entertainment Services, Fantasy Companions, and Fantasy Playmates.

Alicia wound up in the York Correctional Institution, in Niantic, Connecticut, where she, like Gwen, dried out, and where Detective Scates first interviewed her, on Gwen’s suggestion. “Both Alicia and Gwen got off heroin on their own,” Scates reflects, “which makes me really believe that Paris and Forbes kept them on drugs for their own purposes.” And, of course, their habits had turned into an insidious vicious cycle, too, because they self-medicated in order to numb out the nightmare their lives had become.

Gwen also freed herself from Paris through an arrest—this time his own, on June 17, 2004—nearly a year after her infernal ordeal had begun. Paris’s parole officer had found him in violation of his curfew, imposed upon him after the 1999 conviction for third-degree larceny. Without money, food, clothes, a bed, or a shower, Gwen wandered out to Wethersfield Avenue to turn a few tricks, on her own, to raise cash for bus fare. “I wanted to go home,” she said. Instead, she was picked up in the June 18 sting that landed her in Detective Scates’s custody.

The Task Force

Based on her experience with the Alpha Club, Scates knew she had a federal case on her hands, involving money-laundering, interstate commerce, conspiracy, and the Mann Act—the 1910 federal white-slave statute prohibiting the transporting of individuals across state lines for the purposes of prostitution. “First thing,” Scates says, “I went to [I.R.S. special agent] Douglas Werth,” her cohort on the Alpha bust, who, with his six-foot-five-inch frame and Glock 40, does not fit the stereotypical image of an I.R.S. number cruncher. “Criminals usually fear the I.R.S. more than the F.B.I. Going to jail is the cost of doing business,” Werth explains. “But nobody wants their stuff taken from them.” Adds Werth, who has spent more than 20 years with the I.R.S., “Pretty quickly, we realized that this was bigger than Alpha—there were more people, younger girls, and a real bad guy.”

From the instant, in late 2004, Paris was released from jail for his curfew violation, Scates and her colleague Sergeant Christopher McKee, a brawny, blue-eyed 12-year veteran of the neighboring Windsor, Connecticut, police department and supervisor of its Crime Suppression Unit, kept the fat pimp under constant surveillance. Christopher Fanning—one of Paris’s drivers—and Ronald Martinez’s flunky Kazimierz Sulewski picked Paris up from prison. Under the vigilant watch of Scates and McKee, Paris resumed business, this time from Hartford’s Super 8 Motel, at 57 West Service Road. “We had to be careful while he was out that he didn’t victimize people,” says Scates. “We did see him meet with one victim. It was very upsetting to watch and do nothing.”

Around nine a.m. on February 17, 2005, F.B.I. special agent Christine Grispino, I.R.S. special agent Doug Werth, Sergeant Christopher McKee, a postal inspector, and Detective Deborah Scates, armed with a federal search warrant, raided his Super 8 room, No. 204, where he was found watching TV. They arrested Paris on state charges—an independent victim had filed a complaint of sexual assault—and held him in state custody. From the MacDougall-Walker correctional facility three days later, an indictment would charge, Paris phoned Ronald Martinez, the bail-bondsman, and advised him to destroy evidence of their common illicit activities.

“Paris is highly intelligent,” Doug Werth says, “but—unlike Brian Forbes—he was stupid about using credit cards,” the method of payment for a percentage of his transactions. Paris liked using credit cards because they made it even easier for him to deny the girls cash; the cards also helped boost his revenues and gave him an ersatz aura of legitimacy. “When he was arrested,” McKee says, “he insisted he was legitimate because he took credit cards and paid taxes”—on an income, Paris’s defense attorney, Jeremiah Donovan, says, of between $100,000 and $200,000 a year. Werth continues, “The crazy thing is the number of men who use credit cards for this type of thing. Everyone seems to have a little room on his credit card, and nobody thinks it will be obvious what the service is.” Asks Scates, “How do you think we found the customers?”

Through the MasterCard, Visa, and Discover records, and Paris’s own, meticulous, files, Werth was able to follow the money back to the johns—there were scores of them—“but we could only go back five years, as that is the statute of limitations on money-laundering.” There is also a one-year statute of limitations on patronizing a prostitute, in the state of Connecticut a Class A misdemeanor. Says Sergeant McKee, who conducted interviews with johns, “No one at first wanted to acknowledge patronizing a prostitute.” (The average john is married, employed, and in his late 30s; their numbers, according to studies, are escalating.) Says Scates, “They came from every walk of life you could think of.” Remarks Caroline, the 4-H girl, “You name it, every guy is into it. I had a politician, a prosecutor, a police officer, a lawyer, doctors right in Saint Francis Hospital. There’s more of them than of us—and I don’t respect them.”

One 60-ish man, a former Fortune 500–company administrator, bragged, Sergeant McKee says, that his retirement plan consisted of having sex with as many prostitutes as possible. Most of the johns were startled to learn that the girls were not acting of their own free will—75 to 80 percent of prostitutes don’t. The men believed the ads, and the legend of the Happy Hooker. Each of them also assumed they were the one exception to the rule of the repulsive customer. Says Karen Stauss, the former staff attorney for Polaris Project, a D.C.-based not-for-profit anti-slavery-and-human-trafficking organization, “Johns don’t understand what they’re contributing to. It never occurs to them that the woman who is smiling is being abused. They really don’t know what’s going on—and they don’t care.”

As Scates, McKee, Werth, and F.B.I. special agent Grispino widened and deepened their investigation—Grispino traced the numbers of at least 23,000 calls from Paris’s cell phone—“it just continued to develop,” McKee says. Recalls Scates, “We were one team working together—no egos, no rivalry, which is unusual.” But, Werth notes, “Debbie Scates was the Derek Jeter of the team.” To prevent leaks (the offenders had law-enforcement contacts because of the bonding company), for two years the task force kept its activities secret. “The more rocks we turned over,” McKee says, “the more we found going on under them.”

In his checkered career, Paris alone, Scates says, had worked up to 100 females. “If we had a name, we did everything in our power to try to locate that person,” McKee says. “But because girls had ‘stage names,’ it often made them hard to find.” Observes Scates, though the economic circumstances of the girls varied and they covered the full racial spectrum, “a common theme with every victim is that they came from a dysfunctional home with no positive male role model.” If there was poverty of any kind, it was of the emotional variety. The men trafficking them also cut right across ethnic lines—Paris and Forbes are black; Kazimierz Sulewski (whose hideout was a suburban McMansion) is Polish; Ronald Martinez has a Hispanic surname; Christopher Fanning is white.

“It’s surprising how many of the females were willing to talk,” McKee continues. “It was partly relief about confessing, but mostly that there was someone listening. Detective Scates has a fantastic knack for being a good street investigator and for listening to people, but not too much like a social worker. She gives them attention and respect. That’s what broke the case wide open.”

The T.V.P.A.

Scates and her task force were “halfway through the case,” she says, when they stumbled upon sex-trafficking laws, recent, but little-known, federal statutes that have reclassified severe forms of pimping—such as those practiced by Paris and Forbes—as modern-day slavery, in violation of the 13th Amendment, and punishable by life sentences.

Introduced and signed into law under the Clinton administration, the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. 1591, covers labor trafficking as well as sex trafficking, but only when a commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or when the person induced to perform such an act is a minor, under 18. Trafficked foreign nationals, who were the original focus of the statute, are granted an automatic refugee-type status, which allows them access to health, education, and housing services, as well as to special “T” visas, a stepping-stone to a green card. The T.V.P.A. also created a large infrastructure to address trafficking overseas, and a State Department rating system—Saudi Arabia, for example, is a Tier III, pariah country—to penalize governments that fail to meet stringent U.S. anti-slavery standards.

One positive blowback of the T.V.P.A. was that it brought attention to domestic sex trafficking—pimping—which follows the same models and patterns as its international counterparts. “The logic was: if you get weepy-eyed about a young girl in Cambodia, why not feel the same way about the girl trafficked from Iowa?” explains Isobel Coleman, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Re-authorized in 2003 and 2006, the T.V.P.A. was updated again in 2008 with a bill introduced by then senator Joe Biden and signed into law by President Bush in December 2008. Ideally, the latest re-authorization will help to redress the fact that special restitution has not been readily available to victims who are U.S. citizens; help to remove from pimps the defense that they did not know a child’s age; and, advocates hope, help to transfer the burden of proof away from the victims—76 percent of whom suffer from post-traumatic-stress disorder and many of whom still have Stockholm-syndrome-like “trauma bonds” with their pimps. Says Karen Stauss, now program director of Free the Slaves, “Victims are terrified to testify. It makes it harder to bring a case.”

As states begin to adopt trafficking statutes of their own—New York did on November 1, 2007, and Connecticut on July 1, 2006—the Department of Justice, in its effort to “abolish vestiges of slavery,” an official there says, plans to concentrate funding on outreach and training (more than on victim services) to bolster anti-sex-trafficking efforts on state and local levels, much as it launched initiatives to combat domestic battering after the 1994 passage of the Violence Against Women Act. In May 2009, President Obama appointed Luis de Baca the State Department’s ambassador-at-large to monitor and combat trafficking in persons. During the Senate hearing leading to his appointment, de Baca underscored the analogies between the anti-domestic-violence and sex-trafficking movements, and emphasized that “no one is for sale.” In March 2011, the Senate introduced a bipartisan bill, the Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking Deterrence and Victims Support Act, which, if passed, will authorize grants for both law-enforcement activities and direct services to American minor survivors.

The unlikely trafficking-abolitionist coalition—consisting of secular social-justice advocates, faith-based groups, black activists, second- and fourth-wave feminists, liberals, conservatives, Democrats, and Republicans—shares a peculiar adversary in the form of trafficking skeptics, coming largely from the left. The Nation, for example, ridiculed the “‘sex slave’ panic,” and both Slate and City Pages questioned the alarming statistics published by the Department of Justice, the State Department, and non–government organizations such as ecpat and the Salvation Army. “All the numbers we have on trafficking are inaccurate,” avows Deirdre Bialo-Padin, chief of the domestic-violence bureau of the Brooklyn D.A.’s office. “They’re too low. It’s an underreported crime. Who is going to raise her hand and say, ‘Hi, I’m a trafficking victim!’ when her family has been threatened? With the right laws in place, we will get harder numbers.” For victim advocates, saying that trafficking in America isn’t a problem is akin to J. Edgar Hoover saying the Mafia doesn’t exist. Melissa Farley believes “we’re still in the Dark Ages with trafficking because, unlike incest, rape, and domestic battering, trafficking generates massive revenues—$32 billion a year worldwide.”

What else, Dr. Sharon Cooper wonders, are we to conclude when Lee Iacocca tees off on a golf course with Snoop Dogg, a self-described ex-pimp who composes odes to beating women, “breaking bitches,” and (to use the vernacular) “turning them out” on the “track”—or, for that matter, when a country girl such as Caroline ends up with a pimp’s gun in her mouth so that she’ll go out and service a politician?

In the winter of 2006, Assistant U.S. Attorney James Genco began writing an indictment which would accuse Martinez, Paris, Forbes, Shanaya Hicks (a.k.a. “Toni”), Kazimierz Sulewski, Christopher Fanning, and four more of, among other crimes, a conspiracy to use interstate facilities (cell phones and telephone wires) to promote prostitution. Seeking some additional input, “Genco reached out to Washington,” Scates says. “That’s when Andrew Kline got involved.”

Special Litigation Counsel Andrew Kline, a Clinton appointee with an M.A. in human rights from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, was one of four attorneys in the Human Trafficking Prosecution Unit of the Department of Justice, in the Civil Rights Division. It fell upon the curly-haired, bespectacled Kline (now a senior adviser in the executive office of the president) and one other colleague to provide U.S. attorneys nationwide with training on prosecuting trafficking cases.

Kline was the civil-rights expert who brought the T.V.P.A. to the attention of James Genco and the task force, and who helped bring to bear on the Paris case the full artillery of federal resources, which would include his services as a prosecutor, supplementary to Genco’s. By the time the case went to trial, says Paris’s defense lawyer, Jeremiah Donovan, “there were 12 to 14 feds on one side of the aisle—four case agents, each with his own paralegal. On the other side, there was just Paris and myself. The amount of money the federal government has to spend is immense. They invested in the case. ”

When Scates and McKee prepared to make their arrests, in March 2006—with Paris safely out of the way at the MacDougall-Walker prison as a result of the sexual assault complaint—they had a more advanced legal weapon in their arsenal. In addition to the charges of conspiracy to promote prostitution, money-laundering, and use of interstate facilities to promote prostitution, which also applied to the other offenders, Forbes, Hicks, and Paris were each indicted on two counts (one for Gwen, one for Alicia) of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion. In total, there were 56 counts and 10 offenders. “It had been so long, so involved,” recalls Sergeant McKee, “and then the turning point came—moving toward resolution, we scooped up everyone that was indicted within 24 hours.”

For six months Brian Forbes had been holed up off the Berlin Turnpike, in Room 101 of the Almar Motel, along with a few pit bulls and “several cars in the parking lot,” Scates says. “We watched him and watched him. We got his indictment down, and on the day of the indictment, we came back to the motel and he had checked out. By luck, we found out he had just been picked up in Meriden for a traffic ticket.” Scates drove 28 miles south in her unmarked car to Meriden, peered down a side street, and “there he was.” As she arrested him, Scates told Forbes, “If you like hitting women, go ahead and hit me now.” But on this occasion, the detective says, “he punked out.”

It emerged, during the now nearly two-year-long investigation, that a number of the girls Paris and Forbes had “turned out” had been minors as young as 14. But until the task force had Andrew Kline’s input, Scates and McKee had not recognized all of them as such. “In Connecticut,” Scates explains, “the age of consent is 16. But according to the federal trafficking laws, a minor is anyone under 18.”

“The most invigorating part of the case,” McKee says, “was when we turned up Minors A, B, and C,” three former friends who had been ninth-graders together at East Hartford High School when Paris and Forbes ensnared them. “Paris would take girls out of school during lunchtime, have them do calls, and bring them back,” Scates says. “He knew how to read each girl—this one likes to party, that one needs a job, this one wants drugs. He told them he could get them into clubs. Later, we showed the johns high-school-yearbook pictures of these girls as they had looked concurrently, as freshman. The guys were shocked.”

Minor A—now well regarded enough in the Hartford community that when it came time for her to testify in court she disguised herself with a dark wig—was 14 when she met Paris, then 27, in the winter of 1999. She had left home and started living with a friend. Paris asked her if she would be interested in a part-time position as a hotel housekeeper. He took her to the Days Inn on Hartford’s Brainard Road (a former manager there was Paris’s “baby momma”), led her up to a room, and then explained that the job would involve “just spending time with men and just going on dates,” the minor recalled. Then “he asked me to dance. So I danced. And he asked me to take my clothes off”—and he had sex with her. After that, he advertised her in The Hartford Advocate under the name Sasha, booked her for two or three calls a day, on and off for a year and a half, adding up to around 100 calls in total.

“There were so many, many girls,” Scates says. “It was frustrating for law enforcement. Where do we cut the line? After a certain point, we had to stop searching for them. We had enough for the case.”

“These guys,” McKee says, “truly are monsters. Most people committing crimes aren’t bad people—they act out of necessity, for financial gain. But these guys were bad people taking advantage of vulnerable, weak, troubled girls. This was the most significant case I ever worked on. What made it even more significant to me is that I have two daughters. Though they look like me, both my daughters were adopted from substance-abusing parents in low-income situations. So it’s real personal. It made me look at prostitution—everything—in a totally different light. Instead of ‘She’s committing a crime,’ I now think, Why is she there? Who put her there? But for the grace of God these victims could be my little girls.”

After the last of the juveniles was flushed out, in the summer of 2006, James Genco, acting under Connecticut U.S. attorney Kevin J. O’Connor, and advised by Andrew Kline, drafted a 64-count superseding indictment, onto which were added 2 counts for Paris and 3 counts for Forbes, of sex trafficking of a minor.

Ronald Martinez, who became a cooperating witness, was the first of the indicted to plead guilty, on August 22, 2006. Christopher Fanning—who was so scared of Sergeant McKee that he all but threw up right in the courtroom at the sight of him—pleaded guilty on November 16, 2006. Kazimierz Sulewski pleaded guilty on November 30, 2006, and was sentenced to 36 months’ imprisonment on December 11, 2007.

Shanaya Hicks pleaded guilty on March 14, 2007, and was sentenced to 46 months. On March 4, 2007, Brian Forbes pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to use an interstate facility to promote prostitution, three counts of sex trafficking of a minor, and two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion.

Alone among the 10 co-defendants, Dennis Paris self-confidently entered a plea of not guilty to 21 counts. “If I were Paris, I would have gone to trial, too,” says his attorney, Jeremiah Donovan, appointed by Judge Christopher F. Droney, under the Criminal Justice Act (and now representing defendant Joshua Komisarjevsky in the home-invasion triple-murder case in Cheshire, Connecticut, involving endocrinologist Dr. William Petit’s family). The U.S. v. Dennis Paris, a.k.a. “Rahmyti,” thus became among the first cases ever to go to trial putting to the test the T.V.P.A.’s definition of sex trafficking by force, fraud, and coercion.

The Trial

Right away, Paris attempted, unsuccessfully, to file a motion to exclude women from the jury. If anything, his efforts backfired; several of the jurors selected were doting fathers of young daughters. When the trial opened—at 9:30 a.m., on Monday, June 4, 2007, at the U.S. District Courthouse in the Abraham Ribicoff Federal Building, 450 Main Street, in downtown Hartford—Minor A, in her dark wig, was the first in the procession of prosecution witnesses to take the stand. Minor B immediately followed her former classmate. During her two-week stint with Paris, who threw her out because he tired of her complaints about staying up late on school nights, Minor B worked for Forbes as well, and had suffered at the hands of a john who, among other perverse acts, stuffed another woman’s underwear down her throat.

Later that day, the minors’ lurid testimony was sensationally amplified by Gwen’s. Cowering and gasping for air, Gwen had barely started speaking when she succumbed to a panic attack. Judge Christopher Droney called for a break. McKee recalls, “Gwen totally broke down. Our hearts went out to her. She was reliving the experience. Then the defense attorney was on her. He really had some zest in questioning her. He just wrecked this girl on the stand.” Reflects Scates, “Donovan’s only strategy was to discredit Gwen, but she was completely credible. Gwen was literally curled up in a ball with her knees up, leaning toward the judge’s bench, sobbing mournfully.”

Donovan, however, who terms Gwen “an airhead” and “a drama queen,” insists that “her testimony was so clearly false. There was no reason to believe her. It’s not like either she or Alicia was enslaved. You have to take their stories with a grain of salt. This is the same level of violence that you see every morning on the family-violence docket in southern Connecticut. They were free agents—it was in their own self-interest to spin the story to say they were tricked. They were young; maybe their judgment wasn’t as good as it should have been. But they could have stopped anytime they wanted. These were women with no skills. They would have been working at McDonald’s otherwise.” He does acknowledge that “Alicia had a more frightening experience.”

The next day, Tuesday, June 5, Scates says, “there was not a dry eye in the courtroom when Alicia, this tiny girl, told her story of being handcuffed, raped, and wrapped in a blanket. When he cross-examined her about it, Donovan wasn’t able to destroy Alicia like he was able to do with poor Gwen. Although at one point during the cross-examination she gave me a look that said, ‘Save me,’ and Donovan accused her of trying to get signals from me.”

Alicia’s would-be gravedigger, Barry Perez, serving time for possession of crack cocaine and given immunity, spoke after her. “He was a big guy, all tattooed up and in a prison uniform, corroborating everything Alicia had just said,” Scates says.

After Perez’s testimony came that of two johns. The phone numbers and credit-card information of both had appeared in the records reviewed by Douglas Werth and Christine Grispino, and both had answered Paris’s Advocate ads. Michael Huchko, an IBM retiree, who also took photographs for the Windsor Muster, the town’s fife-and-drum corps, had little recollection of what the girls whom he had hired looked like, but he did remember how much he had paid for them ($175 for an hour of “half and half”—intercourse plus oral—with one; $250 for an hour of the same with two).

On Wednesday, June 6, Caroline, the 4-H girl, chronicled the highlights of her odyssey with Paris. A diminutive blonde with fine, even features and a tiny voice, she kept her composure, even as Donovan tenaciously hammered away. When Donovan inquired about the price of an appointment with a prostitute, Caroline shot back, “You mean you don’t know?,” eliciting laughs from around the courtroom. “Caroline was our feistiest witness,” Scates says. “Her presence helped win the day.” On June 7, 2007, Grispino and Werth, the latter of whom hurried out of court on an afternoon to catch up with a 10-year-old daughter’s softball game, carefully explained to the jurors for four and a half hours how Paris’s business relied on facilities—condoms, cell phones, motels, beepers, pagers, a handheld credit-card processing device, and telephone wires—that affected interstate commerce.

Toward the end of the week, several poised, well-dressed girls entered the courtroom, and the task force thought for an instant that more minors had been rounded up. Paris appeared to appraise the young unknown females instinctively out of the corner of his eye, Scates says. Soon enough they all learned that they had been mistaken; Judge Droney had invited his two daughters and their college friend to observe the proceedings.

On June 12, Paris testified on his own behalf. According to him, he hired girls to go out on dates with men, for “companionship” only, and if sexual acts took place in the course of these trysts, then it was consensual and without his sanction. “These guys want women who are going to sit there and conversate [sic],” he protested. “Prostitution or sex was not part of the deal.” He claimed he never raped anybody or supplied any drugs—the very suggestion of such activities “makes my skin crawl,” he said. Paris also denied knowing that any of the minors were under-age, in spite of the fact that they fretted about homework, carried false IDs, and were unable to buy their own cigarettes. One victim could get her tattoo only if “Toni” accompanied her, claiming to be a guardian. Paris also shared with the assembled men and women the intimate anatomical fact that as a “big guy … I need big condoms.” He advanced the idea that he “treated [Alicia and Gwen] better than everybody else” and “without me [Alicia] would have been living under a bridge.” Scates says, “His attitude was ‘I was their Jesus and their savior, their knight in shining armor. I gave them food and shelter.’ And he believes it.”

To Donovan, “Paris was just a guy on a cell phone acting as an agent for the girls. Forbes was different—brutal, and not too bright. I always thought Paris had potential. He’s a really interesting character, charming, so fly. It’s showbiz: Paris is the talent agent, the john’s the audience, the girl’s the performer. This particular case is nothing more than standard pimping and prostitution—not human trafficking, bringing some girl in from Thailand. It’s the federalization of local crimes. Any street Connecticut pimp can now easily be found guilty of federal crimes. A hot-sheet motel has become an instrumentality of interstate commerce.… The feds are out looking for traffickers the way they’re all out looking for terrorists, going into some Pakistani’s shop. Human trafficking is a trendy topic now. That’s the ebb and flow of law enforcement. Prostitutes go to prostitution class, and Dennis Paris goes for life.”

On June 14, 2007, the jury found Paris guilty on every count. Paris complained to a U.S. marshal escorting him, “Twenty-one counts, and I didn’t even get one!” Scates recalls, “It was as if it were a game, or a bet. He is the most arrogant man.” On the way out of court, Paris taunted the detective: “You got lucky this time, Scates!”

Epilogue

In the wake of her arrest and the trial, Gwen, now 26, was re-united with her businessman father. “Gwen’s dad is a really awesome man,” Scates says. “He should have been in her life all along.” She returned home, completed her G.E.D., and attended a community college. In early October 2009, a Vermont district judge, impressed with Gwen’s exemplary recovery, ended the girl’s probation several years early and could wipe her record clean of heroin possession. Alicia enrolled in a long-term residential rehab program in New England, which she successfully completed on April 4, 2008. Included in her curriculum—designed to restore to her the life skills of which she had been deprived—was a course in child care. She gave birth to a baby boy, “and she is a good mother,” Scates says. “Alicia and Gwen are the most courageous people I’ve met. They’ve told their story—told the truth—and that’s all they ever really wanted.”

Caroline became a science student at a large university, on financial aid, and held a campus job. “It’s hard,” Caroline says. “I make peanuts—in a week less than I used to earn in a day. I have lifelong mental scarring, and flashbacks of bad episodes. I went to a psychiatrist and told her my whole story, and she said, ‘Don’t you think you did anything wrong? I can’t help you—you have too many problems.’ During my day-to-day routine, I wonder all the time, Do people know? Can they tell? Is it showing?”

Krishna Patel, Dr. Sharon Cooper, Sergeant Chris McKee, and Detective Scates all agree that the single greatest frustration of rescuing trafficked girls is finding a safe haven for them. The Rebecca Project for Human Rights estimates that there are only 200 residential beds dedicated to this purpose in the entire country, 13 of them at gems. (New York State’s Safe Harbor Act and Illinois’s 2010 Safe Children Act will try to rectify this shortage, at least for cooperative juvenile victims.) Typically, law enforcement will, as a stopgap, lodge girls in motels, “exactly the scenes of their traumas,” Scates notes. The second-hardest part is finding them treatment. “There are experts in rape, addiction, sexual abuse, battering, but not in counseling trafficking victims who suffer from all these problems combined,” Scates says.

“My girls will be in my life forever,” the policewoman continues. “I’m emotionally attached. I can’t walk away. From the start, I followed two rules: I never lied to them, and I never made promises I couldn’t keep. These people touch your heart. What can you do as a human being but help?”

Scates’s exertions on behalf of her girls did not go unnoticed. In 2006 the equestrienne turned detective won the Excellence in Performance Award from Connecticut’s Association of Women Police. On September 7, 2007, each member of the task force received a U.S. Attorney Award at a ceremony in New Haven attended by Alberto Gonzales. And on October 20, 2009, at Constitution Hall in D.C., Attorney General Eric Holder presented Scates and McKee with the William French Smith Award for outstanding contributions to cooperative law enforcement.

Exactly 10 months after the Paris trial, on April 7, 2008, Werth, McKee, Scates, Grispino, and Genco, as well as Gwen and Alicia (who drove down together from Vermont), were re-united in district court at Hartford’s Abraham Ribicoff Building for the sentencing of Brian Forbes. It had been nearly five years since the girls had last laid eyes on their oppressor. Both girls, whose figures had filled out, were in jeans. Gwen wore hers with a white puff-sleeved peasant top, and Alicia, with a pale-aqua hoodie. When Forbes entered the courtroom, in his prison khakis and with his muscle gone to fat—much of it deposited in the folds on the back of his neck—Gwen began to tremble. A reporter seated beside Gwen on the wooden spectators’ bench took off her shearling jacket and passed it to the wavy-haired, open-faced girl. Gwen nervously kneaded the garment, and covered her eyes with it when Forbes walked past her down the aisle; Alicia, hair dyed red, bent over in her seat, elbows resting on knees, and buried her face in her hands.

In a last-ditch effort to lighten his sentence, Forbes, stationed at the defendant’s table, swiveled his eyes in the girls’ direction and declared to Judge Droney that he was “sorry to the victims”—without, however, addressing them by name.

In mild, measured tones, the judge censured Forbes for having “lured these vulnerable young women into his care and then forced them to prostitute themselves. They suffered unspeakable acts.… On many days, they were forced to have as many as seven appointments with men they did not know, and often were not even paid by Mr. Forbes. He physically abused these girls and forced himself on them sexually. When they tried to leave …, he locked them in their room. He withheld heroin from them and beat them. This was a world of terror for these young girls, and Mr. Forbes did so much to create that world. He only released them when he sold them, like animals, to Mr. Paris. These girls lost many precious things that other young people treasure during their teenage years, and Mr. Forbes was largely responsible. This has been a day,” he concluded, “long in coming.”

And Judge Droney sentenced Forbes to 156 months—13 years of real federal time—with a supervised release of 3 years. Additionally, he mandated a restitution identical to the one he had imposed on Shanaya Hicks (“Toni”) at her sentencing the week before—$16,339.20. The sum covered Connecticut minimum wages plus overtime for the two-month, seven-days-a-week, 16-hours-a-day period of Gwen’s and Alicia’s enslavement to Forbes.

Alicia seemed relieved and Gwen buoyant as they departed the Main Street courthouse for the last time—they would not be back for Paris’s sentencing that coming October. “It’s all behind them now,” Scates says.

McKee and Werth, however, lingered by a marble pillar in the second-floor lobby, swapping anecdotes about their daughters and analyzing Droney’s decision. “The judge got it,” McKee said. “He was offended.”

Mounted Police

Minutes later, under the porte cochère of the downtown Marriott, on Columbus Boulevard, Scates—dressed in her customary turtleneck, blazer, jeans, boots, and wire-rimmed glasses—shared some news that she’d been waiting at least 13 years to hear. Hartford would be resurrecting its mounted division, and Scates at long last would be joining it. “We’ve got 90 days of training ahead of us—we’ll patrol concerts and the big parks where cars can’t go. It’s going to be a huge community bridge. Imagine riding up to an elementary school and seeing kids’ eyes light up—how cool is that? It’s a totally different image—they’ll start to think maybe a cop’s a nice guy. People don’t understand why I would turn in my badge to become a regular police officer. But I’m just as proud to be an officer as a detective. No more stress! It’s time to give my husband and my kids peace of mind.

“Finally I’m doing what I set out to do 13 years ago. But it had to take this long. I needed to be in a certain place at a certain time for Gwen and Alicia. Everything happens for a reason. That’s how life works. I truly believe this.”

Nature Abhors a Vacuum

Sergeant McKee reflects, “This was a good case. It worked. A huge message was sent to local police departments about the existence of the T.V.P.A. But it’s no different from the drug trade. With Paris and Forbes removed, others will come along to take their place.”

A month into her training for the mounted police, Scates called again to say she just spent a sleepless night. At two p.m. the day before, she cruised past the Motel 6. “And there they were all over again—14-, 15-, 16-year-old girls in five-inch heels and miniskirts, walking across the parking lot. I called my old lieutenant and asked him if he could do something.”

Scates had noticed that the X-rated classifieds in the back of The Hartford Advocate had dwindled slightly, she hoped as a result of the task force’s valiant efforts. But she quickly caught on that a new, tech-savvy generation of pimps was filling the void by merchandising girls on Craigslist (in September 2010 the site succumbed to pressure to remove its adult-services section, which was expected to earn $44 million last year); on Backpage.com (owned by Village Voice Media); or via theeroticreview.com. Females on theeroticreview.com are rated for consumers—ostensibly by “hobbyists” but more often than not, victims say, by their ever shrewder pimps. With the help of untraceable, prepaid cell phones and credit cards, this futuristic breed of trafficker can, unlike Dennis Paris, obliterate any paper trail. “It’s degrading, it’s dangerous, it’s sickening,” says Eva, the Norwich girl whose in-laws forced her to turn tricks at the casinos. “People say about you, ‘You’re nasty. You had all those dicks in your mouth.’ But then guys are also like, ‘Oh, wow!! Let me see—how much is she?’ It’s so big, this industry, it’s everywhere. Strip clubs, pornography, the street, the hotel—for us, it all amounts to the same revolting thing.” Natalie, the gems girl, says, “Prostitution and pimping—it’s never going to stop. Tricks—they should start from there. If no one’s buying girls, then the pimps can’t make money.”

That, in fact, is exactly the theory behind the Sex Purchase Law in Sweden. As of 1999, johns are punished by up to six months’ imprisonment, traffickers are locked up for 2-to-10-year hits, and prostitutes are offered medical care, education, and housing. As a result, prostitution has been reduced by 50 percent in Sweden, and the purchase of sex, which is understood to be a human-rights abuse, has decreased by 75 percent. In contrast, Europol studies show, nations such as Holland and Australia, where prostitution has been legalized, have become lucrative, low-risk magnets for international sex-slave drivers and organized crime. On the subject of Sweden’s demand-side laws—which Finland and Norway have now adopted, and Denmark is currently considering—Sweden’s minister for justice, Beatrice Ask, notes, “If we could get rid of slavery, then I think this type of buying human beings is something that we have to fight too.”

In the meantime, here in the U.S., hot-pink patent-leather stiletto crib shoes for baby girls, aged zero to six months, and Abercrombie & Fitch push-up padded bikinis for eight-year-olds have been all the rage in downward-deviant fashion, prostitution is a mainstay of Las Vegas’s economy, and Ice-T has produced a documentary on the life of Iceberg Slim, who, in his dotage, expressed remorse in Pimp for his wasted youth and his squandered fortune, but never for any of the girls he thrashed into red jelly with his homemade wire whip. Slim did speculate, however, that his cruelty toward women arose from his “unconscious hatred” for his mother. “It’s disgusting,” Natalie says. “The pimp is winning out.”

Coda: Paris Is Burning

On the Indian-summer afternoon of Tuesday, October 14, 2008, Judge Christopher Droney sentenced an unrepentant Dennis Paris to 30 years in prison, at the bottom of the federal guidelines, and to three years’ supervised release. Additionally, Droney ordered Paris to pay a combined restitution of $46,116 to Gwen and Alicia. (As a result of the Supreme Court’s Santos decision in June 2008, the three money-laundering counts were dropped.) Characterizing the Paris case as among the “most sad and disheartening” of his career, Droney, for the record, concluded from his bench, “We will never know why Mr. Paris constructed this hell for these girls … a world of pain, humiliation, suffering, and sexism.”

At least eight U.S. marshals—“more,” Scates says, “than I’ve ever seen in a courtroom in my whole life”—converged on Droney, James Genco, Andrew Kline, and “talent agent” Paris to rush them out of the building. Explains Scates, advised for the first time in her career to bear arms in court, the marshals wanted to deter any outburst from Paris’ supporters.

Two years later, in September 2010, Chief Judge Jacobs and circuit judges Wesley and Chin of the U.S. Court of Appeals at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, at 500 Pearl Street, in Manhattan, denied Dennis Paris his appeal. “We don’t need to worry,” Officer Scates said on a recent afternoon, fresh from the stable and a visit to her new grandchild. “That was his final chance.”

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2011/05/sex-trafficking-201105?currentPage=all

 

Porn trade group has plan for actor health care

SHAYA TAYEFE MOHAJER
The Age
May 27, 2011

Porn performers will soon be given a list of recommended health care providers for their frequent sexually transmitted disease testing, and results will be fed into a new industry database, according to a porn trade group.

Free Speech Coalition Executive Director Diane Duke said Thursday her group will oversee the database as part of a new program intended to fill the gap created by the closure of Adult Industry Medical Health Care Foundation earlier this month.

“We will be able to provide a list of recommended providers to our performers and ensure they will have sensitivity to the client base that we’d be bringing to these providers,” Duke said at a news conference.

Known as the AIM clinic, the shuttered San Fernando Valley facility was a preferred medical provider for many performers in the multibillion-dollar porn industry, providing a discreet environment for frequent HIV and STD tests.

The Free Speech Coalition’s program to replace AIM, known as Adult Production Health and Safety Services, won’t open a new clinic.

“Unfortunately, the FSC is not in a position to set up a medical facility or a clinic,” said board member Christian Mann, who is also a general manager at Evil Angel Video. “One of the things we learned from the closure of AIM is to avoid overreaching.”

Within a week, Duke said, performers will be provided a list of labs and clinics where they can get testing and have their results fed into the database.

The password-protected database allows actors and producers to track whether performers have been diagnosed with gonorrhea, chlamydia or if they are HIV positive.

The database will tell users whether an actor is available to work or not, depending on whether they have any of the sexually transmitted infections the system tracks.

The system makes an exception for HIV-positive gay performers who still work in sex scenes while using condoms.

Former Los Angeles County STD program director Dr. Gary Richwald is serving the trade group as a consultant and says the group is now reaching out to medical providers with education to ensure sex performers aren’t treated with insensitivity and hostility for their work.

“It’s not what you say, but how you say it,” Richwald said about a doctor’s responsibility to advise a performer of the risks they face in porn. “We also want to provide assurance that the tests being done (at recommended medical providers) are the best tests available.”

The AIM clinic was forced to close permanently earlier this month following a series of controversies.

After porn actor Derrick Burts was diagnosed HIV-positive there in December, state and local officials said the clinic failed to cooperate with their investigation into other possible infections. Burts said that instead of getting information from the clinic on how to get follow-up care, he was told to avoid media, change his phone number and leave town.

The clinic was also accused of medical privacy violations after patient information appeared on a website in the run-up to its closure.

Kink.com founder and FSC board member Peter Acworth has led the database development and said his experience thwarting hackers on his site played into developing a secure environment for the performer’s information.

http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-technology/porn-trade-group-has-plan-for-actor-health-care-20110527-1f7aj.html

 

 

How the hardcore porn industry is ruining young men’s lives

Gail Dines
Sydney Morning Herald
May 18, 2011

It rakes in billions, exploits women, and leaves men disgusted with themselves.

AFEW years ago at the Adult Entertainment Expo in Las Vegas, the biggest porn convention in the United States, Abbywinters.com, an Australian porn company, had one of the largest booths. It bills itself as offering “real, passionate, unscripted” sexual activity by “happy, healthy, regular girls in their normal environments”. The company markets its female masturbation and girl/girl videos as featuring women with “no make-up, no fake boobs, no airbrushing”.

The Abbywinters.com women did stand out from the other porn performers in the room, but their girl/girl action (the industry’s term for lesbian sex tailored to a male audience) didn’t look much different from the industry norm.

With all varieties of cameras, men surrounded the booth, vying for the best angles to record images of women being sexual.

Advertisement: Story continues below

That moment provides an important reminder: pornography, at its core, is a market transaction in which women’s bodies and sexuality are offered to male consumers in the interests of maximising profit. In the end, it’s about attracting the most “wankers” possible.

Though reliable numbers are hard to come by, the global industry was estimated to be worth a staggering $96 billion in 2006, with the US market worth about $13 billion. Each year more than 13,000 porn films are released and their revenues rival those of all the major Hollywood studio films combined. DailyTech, an online magazine, reports that a recent study found about 37 per cent of online pages contain pornographic content, and porn sites increased 17 per cent from 2009 to 2010.

Adult Video News, the trade paper of the porn industry, says the most profitable porn today is that which depicts hardcore, body-punishing sex – called “Gonzo” by the industry. In this type of porn, sex is not about making love. The feelings and emotions we normally associate with such an act – connection, empathy, tenderness, caring, affection – are missing, and in their place are those we normally associate with hate: fear, disgust, anger, loathing and contempt.

The man “makes hate” to the woman, as each sex act is designed to deliver the maximum amount of degradation. Whether it be aggressive fellatio or violent sodomy, the goal of porn sex is to illustrate how much power he has over her. Yet the women are still portrayed as enjoying these scenes. Images like these are commonplace on the internet and shape the way men think about sex, relationships and intimacy.

A key factor driving the growth of the porn market has been the development of technologies allowing users to buy and consume porn in private, without embarrassing trips to seedy stores or video rental shops. These technologies also enable pornography to be viewed anywhere, any time: even the global mobile phone market for porn is expected to reach $3.5 billion this year, according to British-based Juniper Research.

This is a business with considerable political clout, with the capacity to lobby politicians, engage in expensive legal battles and use public relations to influence public debate. The business is increasingly able to deploy a sophisticated and well-resourced marketing machine, not just to push its wares but to cast the industry’s image in a positive light – promoting myths that porn is harmless fun, that it is all about fantasy and we should not take it seriously.

We should be taking porn very seriously. Studies show that the more porn men watch, the more they want to play out porn sex in the real world. They become bored with their sex partners because they don’t look or act like the women in porn. What troubles many of these men most is that they need to pull up the porn images in their head in order to have an orgasm with their partner. They replay porn scenes in their minds, or think about having sex with their favourite porn star when they are with their partners.

What is new over the past five years or so is young men admitting their addiction to pornography. I had been somewhat sceptical of the addiction model, thinking that it was a way for men to avoid taking responsibility for their porn use. But sex and relationship therapists Wendy Maltz and Larry Maltz discuss in their book The Porn Trap how therapists are seeing a wave of porn addicts looking for help. They find that “what used to be a small problem for relatively few people had grown to a societal issue that was spilling over and causing problems in the lives of countless everyday people”.

The addicted young men I speak to do indeed end up in serious trouble. They neglect their school work, spend huge amounts of money they don’t have, become isolated from others, and often suffer depression. They know something is wrong, feel out of control, and don’t know how to stop. Some of the most troubling stories I hear are from men who have become so desensitised that they have started using harder porn and end up masturbating to images that had previously disgusted them. Many of these men are deeply ashamed and frightened, as they don’t know where all this will end.

As someone who has studied porn for more than 20 years, I also don’t know where all this is going to end. If we have any hope of stemming the tide, we need to build a movement that includes grassroots education programs and media strategies that lead to cultural change.

It also needs to offer an enticing, positive vision of sexuality based on equality and respect. As long as we have porn, women will never be seen as full human beings deserving of all the rights that men have. We need to build a vibrant movement that fights for a world in which women have power in and over their lives, because there is no room for porn in a just society.

Gail Dines is professor of sociology and women’s studies at Wheelock College, Boston, and the author of Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/how-the-hardcore-porn-industry-is-ruining-young-mens-lives-20110517-1erac.html#ixzz1MckXRlke

 

US phone sex firm amassing 1-800 numbers

A US firm has gone innovative, gaining control over nearly a quarter of all local 1-800 numbers and redirecting callers to a phone-sex service.

“We both have big appetites for sex,” they purr. “Pinch us and poke us. Spank us and tease us. We love it all. … Enter your credit card number now.”

Those naughty misdials, and countless others like them, appear to be no accident.

Records obtained by The Associated Press show that over the past 13 years, a little-known Philadelphia company called PrimeTel Communications has quietly gained control over nearly a quarter of all the 1-800 numbers in the US and Canada, often by grabbing them the moment they are relinquished by previous users. As of March, it administered more 800 numbers than any other company, including Verizon and AT&T.

And many, if not most, of those 1.7 million numbers appear to be used for one thing: redirecting callers to a phone-sex service.

Dial 1-800-Chicago and instead of reaching a tourism hotline for the Windy City, you will hear a woman offering “one-on-one talk with a nasty girl” for $2.99 per minute. A similar thing happens if you punch in the initial digits of 1-800-Metallica, 1-800-Cadillac, 1-800-Minolta, 1-800-Cameras, 1-800-Worship or 1-800-Whirlpool.

All those numbers contain messages redirecting callers to erotic chat lines operated by National A-1 Advertising, a company that shares an office building with PrimeTel, has common ownership and lists many of the same people as executives or business contacts.

Many people who mistakenly dial a phone-sex line probably just get red-faced and hang up as quickly as possible. Others apparently respond to the come-on and supply their credit card number.

“I guess enough people go for it that it makes business sense,” said Aelea Christofferson, president of ATL Communications, another company that specializes in toll-free services. Capturing callers who have reached the wrong number - whether because they punched an incorrect digit or dialed a number without realizing it had changed hands - is a “big new industry,” she said.

Founded in 1995, PrimeTel is one of around 400 companies registered as toll-free service providers for the US and Canada. That gives it the same power to reserve and assign unused toll-free numbers as big phone companies with millions of customers. But PrimeTel appears to be amassing numbers predominantly for one closely related partner, National A-1.

There is nothing illegal about using toll-free phone services to promote adult entertainment, and callers aren’t charged unless they supply their credit card information.

Over the years, though, PrimeTel has been hit with lawsuits and complaints alleging that it is violating federal rules banning toll-free service providers from hoarding digits. Federal Communications Commission rules say that “routing multiple toll-free numbers to a single toll-free subscriber” is usually considered hoarding.

The FCC has never taken formal action against PrimeTel or National A-1, although federal authorities have expressed renewed interest lately in companies that handle toll-free numbers. In the fall, authorities sent subpoenas to several, including PrimeTel, asking for information on how they acquire numbers and why.

And in October, federal agents and Philadelphia police spent two days removing records from National A-1′s office suite, although it is unclear if the action was related to the phone business.

The man listed on many government records as the top executive at both PrimeTel and National A-1, Richard Cohen, declined interview requests. A lawyer for both companies, Charles Helein, would not discuss their business dealings in detail but said PrimeTel isn’t breaking any rules or engaging in prohibited practices such as selling numbers or obtaining ones it doesn’t intend to use.

“They are extremely sensitive to the FCC. … They wouldn’t have them if they didn’t need them,” Mr Helein said of PrimeTel’s huge pool of numbers. He said the company’s large share hasn’t caused any shortages: “Everybody’s got all the numbers they need.”

Mr Helein said the raid last fall was not aimed at PrimeTel. National A-1 and its owners have a variety of business enterprises headquartered at the same address, including a website sometimes used by prostitutes to advertise their services.

According to a database maintained by an industry organisation, PrimeTel was listed as the administrator of record for at least 1,667,000 out of around 7.87 million active 800 numbers as of this March. Industry experts said PrimeTel also holds a dominant share of numbers with other toll-free codes, like 888 and 866, giving it several million numbers overall.

Sex isn’t the only business. Some numbers reach advertisements for a mortgage brokerage based in New Jersey. Others promote a dieting website or a travel reservation service. Those instances appear to be outnumbered by ones in which callers reach a phone-sex solicitation.

Critics of the company say it isn’t the sex that bothers them, but the acquisition of so many numbers.

Bill Quimby, whose company, TollFreeNumbers.com, specializes in helping businesses obtain easy-to-remember digits to connect with customers, said it can be a challenge to find a good match because PrimeTel has gobbled up such an outsized share of the supply.

“They started by getting numbers for phone sex, then getting good numbers in general, then they started taking all phone numbers,” he said.

A spokesman for the FCC, David Fiske, would not comment on whether the agency had ever examined PrimeTel’s activities but said the commission is actively enforcing rules on number hoarding.

PrimeTel appears to have benefited by grabbing numbers associated with famous names, like 1-800-Beatles, or numbers that have recently been canceled but are still advertised widely.

From the late 1980s until around 2005, teenagers who dialed the national hotline used by Teens Teaching AIDS Prevention would reach a call center in Kansas City, Missouri, where other youths were waiting to answer questions about the disease. When that program ended, the number was soon routed to one of National A-1′s sex lines. But the AIDS hotline number is still publicized by public health groups.

When New York City’s Fire Department relinquished its toll-free fire safety hotline a few years ago because of an administrative slip-up, PrimeTel grabbed it the moment it became available. Soon enough, 1-800-FIRETIP was ringing into one of National A-1′s phone-sex lines.

The same thing happened to the Cook County Jail in Chicago when it canceled its toll-free inmate information line, and to rape counseling hotlines in Maine and New Mexico.

The Republican National Committee once printed a fundraising mailer with a toll-free calling code and was publicly embarrassed when the calls began ringing in to one of National A-1′s chat lines.

It happened to Glenn Noyes, too. Shortly after the toll-free number for his auto repair business in Edgewater, was mistakenly cancelled by his phone company, it began redirecting customers to an erotic chat service called “Intimate Encounters”.

“It was pretty embarrassing,” Mr Noyes said. “I had people walking around wearing T-shirts with that number.”

People in the telecommunications industry who are familiar with PrimeTel say that in addition to snapping up familiar 1-800 numbers, the company may be trying to capitalise on people’s fat-finger dialing mistakes by acquiring numbers that are just a digit or two away from a major company’s number.

Mr Helein denied PrimeTel was trying to capitalise from misdials or engaged in a strategy to intercept calls made by customers of other businesses.

The key to PrimeTel’s business is its access to the entity that controls the assignment of toll-free numbers, called the 800 Service Management System. Numbers are available on a first-come, first-served basis at a cost of about 9.6 cents per month. When a customer is done using a number, it is supposed to go back into the pool for use by someone else.

FCC rules expressly ban service providers from reserving a number unless they have a genuine customer lined up to use it. Speculating in numbers is banned. They are considered public resources that may not be bought or sold. The big phone companies that supply toll-free numbers make their money not by selling the number itself but by providing telephone service.

But there are also companies that are illegally buying and selling the numbers, and they are a hot commodity, sometimes even available on eBay.

Such numbers are so highly sought-after that several companies have built powerful computer systems that search the database every day, looking for digits of potential value. Numbers can be reserved as quickly as 95 milliseconds after they are released by former users.

Mr Helein said PrimeTel has been the target of complaints from other industry players who are “jealous” of the company’s computer systems.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/business/porn-company-is-amassing-1-800-numbers/story-e6fredju-1226042160672

© 2011 nothing-about-us-without-us.com Campaigning to address the emerging issues related to the NSW sex industry Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha